Governance readiness before a capital raise.

An independent view of how the company is run, before investors form one.

Some founders do not need fundraising help first. They need to be ready to be funded.

Before capital conversations begin, founders need to know whether the company has the governance, board structure, shareholder alignment and decision discipline investors will expect.

PHCA reviews governance and decision readiness before investor exposure, so founders, boards and shareholders can see what to resolve before the raise becomes public.

What the review covers

Why governance matters before a raise

Investors do not only assess the plan. They assess how the company makes decisions. A strong business with weak governance still raises slowly, on worse terms, or not at all. The questions arrive early. Who controls the company. How decisions are made. What happens when founders disagree. Whether the board, if there is one, adds judgement or just sits there. These get answered before a term sheet, not after. The cost of getting them wrong is paid in valuation and control.

What investors notice first

A few things surface quickly, in diligence and in the first conversations. An unclear or contested cap table. Decision rights that sit entirely with one founder. A board that exists on paper but does not function. Shareholder agreements that are out of date or were never signed. Founder roles that overlap or compete. None of these stops a raise on its own. Together they signal a company that has not been run to be invested in, and investors price that.

What a board or advisory board can and cannot fix

Adding a board is not automatically the answer. A formal board brings accountability and credibility, but also obligation, cost and a real transfer of control. An advisory board brings outside judgement without the legal weight, but carries no authority and is easy to ignore. An independent advisor brings judgement into the room for a defined period, without a seat or a vote. The right structure depends on the decision in front of the company, not on what looks good to investors. The review tests which one the company actually needs, and which would be theatre.

Founder roles, decision rights and shareholder alignment

Most governance problems before a raise are not board problems. They are alignment problems. Founders who have never written down who decides what. Shareholders who assume they agree and have not tested it. Equity splits that no longer reflect contribution. These are harder to fix once an investor is in the room, because every change then looks like a negotiation. The cheapest time to resolve them is before the raise is public, while the company still controls the timing.

Engagement

A fixed review, or independent judgement across the raise.

For a single decision, a fixed-scope Strategic Decision Review is usually enough. It tests the governance and readiness question, produces a written view, and ends.

For a company facing a sequence of decisions over six to twelve months, a raise, then the governance and shareholder questions that follow, the Independent Decision Seat provides independent judgement across the sequence on a retained basis. It is not a board appointment, a fractional executive role, or a substitute for board accountability. It is independent judgement in the room while the decisions are live.

Fee
From $15,000 + GST
Format
Fixed scope review, or retained via the Independent Decision Seat
Output
A written view of governance readiness and what to resolve before investor engagement
Timeframe
Typically two to four weeks for a fixed review
Led by
Peter Howell, Principal, throughout

Questions founders ask before adding governance around a raise

  • Do we need a board before raising capital?
  • Would an advisory board help, or do we need an independent advisor?
  • What governance gaps will investors notice?
  • Are founder roles and decision rights clear enough?
  • Are shareholders aligned before the raise?
  • What should be fixed before investor engagement begins?

Part of PH Capital Advisory’s Strategic Decision Reviews.

View all Strategic Decision Reviews

Related: Capital Raise Review  |  Independent Decision Seat  |  Shareholder Decisions

Next step

Request a 20 minute decision call

If a raise is being considered and the governance, board or shareholder position is not yet settled, the cheapest time to test it is before investors are involved.

Outline the situation in confidence. If it is a fit, you will receive call times within one business day. There is no charge for the call and no obligation beyond it.

Principal
Peter Howell
Based
Tauranga, New Zealand
LinkedIn
Peter Howell

Held in confidence. No mailing list. Fees are never contingent on outcomes.